Gene Moy (梅忠毅) is a user experience architect in Chicago with 12 years experience working on the web. He sometimes thinks every day feels like 1995 all over again. More about Gene »
A few weeks back I did an internal presentation on benchmarking. Isn’t benchmarking just shorthand for plagiarism? No. It shouldn’t be a kneejerk apeing of what someone else is doing just because they seem successful for it. In this article from Harvard Business School, the authors warn against the dangers of casual benchmarking. In the practice I advocate, benchmarking is extremely rigorous: first, understand what is the context for a given practice, then we take things apart and we figure out how they work, why they work, why they break. When this is done with sufficient rigor, i.e. correctly, you can create best of breed practices. But it doesn’t come from just blindly mimicking something just because “it’s cool.”
Permanent link to Monkey see, monkey do
Filed under Interaction Design, Strategy
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
23 Apr 2008 1323HSimon - presentations trainer writes:
Hi - I’m inclined to agree that benchmarking is often done in a half-hearted “let’s copy them” way: would it be possible to see your presentation slides? (Yes, as a presentation trainer I know that the slides aren’t the presentation but at least then we could have a conversation about it!
)
Simon
Fire your weapon, soldier. Just be careful of friendly fire. NAME & EMAIL required.
Proudly powered by WordPress 2.5.1. RSS Feeds for Entries and Comments.
Everything is design is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 License.
Bad Behavior has blocked 620 access attempts in the last 7 days.