Gene Moy (梅忠毅) is a user experience architect from Chicago with 15 years experience working on the web and now, medical devices. Occasionally he thinks every day feels like 1995 all over again. More about Gene »
People ask what a good reading list is for our interdiscipline. But I like to be the contrarian. I say stop reading. Take an interaction. It can be any interaction but preferably human-machine interface. Take it apart. Figure out what is the desired path. Figure out where things can or do go wrong. Put it [...]
Read the rest of Stop reading, start doing
Of all the lousy times to be looking for a new gig, there’s a recession and a marriage banquet and an election and all these things with starting a new life. But I really can’t complain because at least the interviews keep coming, so that signals to me that the market is still fairly strong. [...]
The other day I came across the improper and proper use of progressive disclosure. For those not in the know, progressive disclosure (PD) is a technique we use in interface design, partly to mitigate information overload, to signal that a secondary action is possible, and if selected, information will be solicited from the user. So [...]
Read the rest of Progressive disclosure redux
Probably. We talk about carousels but no one properly seems to know what are the appropriate contexts around when to use them. For those not in the know, carousels are a kind of web user interface widget that essentially displays a subset of a larger set of information in a loop, and typically not only [...]
Read the rest of Are carousels abused?
Was reading a white paper from HFI the other day. Said they wanted to move beyond usability, which as I’ve noted in previous posts, as we typically experience it, is more normative than it is positive. In essence they described what Grokdotcom might call Persuasion Architecture, but which they are calling, Persuasion, Emotion and Trust. [...]
Read the rest of Isn’t that . . . marketing’s function?!
Should we call the kinds of usability testing most of us have been exposed to as preference elicitation instead? Should we not recruit passionate users, who tend disproportionately also to be expert users, and therefore, are unrepresentative of typical users of a site? Should we start to disaggregate the different kinds of work we now [...]
Read the rest of Random recent thoughts
If you invest in solid user experience, interaction design, and usability as central to your corporate values, then you don’t have to spend millions on an expensive media campaign, nor do you have to hire all these “gurus” to help people out: Besides the TV ads, Microsoft is adding content to windows.com, creating a related [...]
Read the rest of Vast oversimplification probably, but
doesn’t necessarily mean that the user will be incented (incentivized?) to take an action. In other words, beyond the role that user experience plays in making things findable and easy to use — for those of us who work in e-commerce, anyway — there is this other role we play in promotion of features. For [...]
Read the rest of Just because it works in a u-test. . .
The latest ploy by Google to own a piece of your desktop is your browser? That’s what this comic shows. Google Chrome, coming soon. But if you were to create your own browser experience, what would it be like?
Read the rest of New Google browser?
Thanks to Ryan for pointing out this opinion piece on the Design for Democracy project. You can also see the interactive piece that shows how it would work. As user experience professionals, and as UPA members, we feel of course that the information design and interaction design are inseparable parts of the entire voting user [...]
Read the rest of Design for Democracy
Proudly powered by WordPress 3.1.4. RSS Feeds for Entries and Comments.
Everything is design is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 License.
Bad Behavior has blocked 1352 access attempts in the last 7 days.